Related Links

News

30% emissions cuts to keep EU renewable energy lead

The European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) is urging the EU to go for 30% emissions cut to keep the EU’s renewable energy leadership.

The call follows the release by the European Commission of its analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions.

EWEA has issued a briefing to MEPs, Commission and Member State officials that “urges Council and European Parliament to agree 30% domestic greenhouse gas reductions, in order to maintain Europe’s technological and industrial leadership in renewable energy technologies.”

EWEA’s briefing states that “the EU has been the cradle of renewable energy innovation, particularly wind power, and the European wind industry represents a growing number of jobs (192,000), significant and growing export opportunities, as well as increased energy security and competitiveness.”

EWEA Chief Executive, Christian Kjaer, says: “The move to 30% would give a very strong signal to investors that Europe means business when it talks about green growth and a sustainable economy. The offer to go to 30% did not work in the Copenhagen climate summit but it would work in keeping the EU at the forefront of the green technology race.

“Europe is a world leader in wind energy but faces serious competition from China, the US, Japan, South Korea and India. I would hate to see Europe losing out because it was lulled into a false sense of security due to the failure of the climate negotiations.”

Share this article

More services

 

This article is featured in:
Policy, investment and markets

 

Comments

Harry Schell said

02 June 2010
With the utter failure of wind power to provide remotely economic power and any significant emissions cuts, this clarion call only makes sense, very cynically, to line the pockets of EWEA members. Germany and Denmark both consider their investments in wind power to be utter failures. The German installed base is producing an average of 8% of its rated capacity. This huge shortfall is made up by fossil plants, so the emissions impact is negative when you consider the cost and effort to install the towers. Spain's economy has been torn heavily by state investment in "green power", losing 2.2 real jobs for every subsidized "green" one. Billions of euro have been spent chasing failure. EWEA is worse than delusional in its urging.

Note: The majority of comments posted are created by members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those Elsevier Ltd. We are not responsible for any content posted by members of the public or content of any third party sites that are accessible through this site. Any links to third party websites from this website do not amount to any endorsement of that site by the Elsevier Ltd and any use of that site by you is at your own risk. For further information, please refer to our Terms & Conditions.

Comment on this article

You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment about this article.