Related Stories

  • Wind turbine producers step into ten league boots
    Wind turbines are getting bigger, driven by economies of scale and the need to increase ‘power per tower’ at wind farms, especially offshore. George Marsh explores the megaturbine seascape.

Feature

How to get the best offshore wind turbine reliability


George Marsh

Part 1. Offshore turbines need to be more reliable than their onshore counterparts. How is this creating divergence in approach as the offshore turbine industry evolves?

About: part 1 of a multi-part article looking at the development of offshore wind turbines as companies look to different approaches to improve reliability.

Outages offshore are more critical than those onshore due to problems of access at sea, limited weather windows during which maintenance work can be carried out, and the sheer size of offshore machines.

Adding to the direct expenses of access and repairs are those due to downtime with its consequent loss of revenue. Historically, the most frequent and expensive result of technical failure in wind turbines has been the need for gearbox repair or replacement.

Debate continues about the extent to which breakdowns originate elsewhere in the drivetrain – in bearings for example – rather than in the gearbox itself, but the result is the same; gearboxes fail. So prevalent has this become that some insurers virtually regard the gearbox as a consumable item and require clients to make provision for periodic replacement. This can happen two or three times during the typical 20-year design lifetime of a wind turbine.

Given that a large gearbox can cost upwards of £200,000, perhaps double this allowing for transport and installation, it is no surprise that the consequent expense can threaten economic viability. The quest for answers is intensifying.

Mitigation

Answers range from proactive operations & maintenance (O&M) measures to designs that dispense with the gearbox altogether. O&M mitigations include fine filtration to keep lubricating oil clean, and use of remote condition monitoring to detect incipient faults so that remedial action can be taken before an actual failure can occur.

Meanwhile, designers have sought to proof their products against the arduous marine environment with corrosion-resistant materials, hermetic sealing and climatic control, while boosting mechanical tolerance through improved component design.

French manufacturer Alstom for example believes that service life can be prolonged by reducing stresses on the gearbox, a result it achieves with its Pure Torque concept. In conventional turbine drivetrains, gearboxes are subjected not only to torque (turning) forces that it is their role to transmit, but also to considerable side forces caused by strong winds and transmitted by the rotor to the main shaft and gearbox.

In the Pure Torque design, the rotor shaft is supported on bearings in a cast iron frame that is an extension of the tower structure. This ensures that deflective stresses are transmitted directly into the tower instead of via the gearbox as happens in most standard designs. Because the gearbox sees only pure torque it should, in common with other downstream drive components, last longer. Alstom is incorporating Pure Torque in the 6 MW offshore turbine that it intends to start producing in 2014. A prototype of its Haliade 150 machine is currently being trialled.

Gamesa and certain other manufacturers similarly transmit side loads to the frame.

This technique still leaves the possibility of misalignments caused by relative movements between the gearbox mounting bed and other structural elements. These are hard to minimise in large machines, but are at least more tolerable if the bending stresses on the gearbox are nullified.

Another type of mechanical stress is that caused when transient high forces due to wind gusts meet the mechanical inertia of the drivetrain, creating oscillatory stresses in shafts and associated components. This can be countered with active damping. A further source of trouble is resonances that can arise within the drivetrain under certain operating conditions and, if prolonged, may cause damage to components. Care at the design stage over structural stiffnesses is needed to avoid harmful resonances.

In part 2 out soon: the drive for fewer components...

About George Marsh: Engineering roles in high-vacuum physics, electronics, flight testing and radar led George Marsh, via technology PR, to technology journalism. He is a regular contributor to Renewable Energy Focus.

Share this article

More services

 

This article is featured in:
Energy infrastructure  •  Wind power

 

Comments

ANUMAKONDA JAGADEESH said

28 November 2012
Excellent post on Reliability of offshore wind turbines. Most of the Wind Turbines installed in offshore windfarms are very large (upto 5 MW now). As such any down time means lot of loss of revenue.Offshore wind power has its challenges, however. Conditions during installation, operation and maintenance may be harsh, and so products must be reliable.
The University of Maine's AEWC Advanced Structures and Composites Center is working on new ways to capture wind energy and has developed a physical model of a floating wind farm that will test digital models from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The information from these tests will significantly accelerate the development of floating offshore wind turbine platforms near U.S. population centers on the East and West coasts.
Sandia National Laboratories' wind energy researchers are re-evaluating vertical axis wind turbines (VAWTs) to help solve some of the problems of generating energy from offshore breezes.
Though VAWTs have been around since the earliest days of wind energy research at Sandia and elsewhere, VAWT architecture could transform offshore wind technology.
The economics of offshore wind power are different from land-based turbines, due to installation and operational challenges. VAWTs offer three big advantages that could reduce the cost of wind energy: a lower turbine center of gravity; reduced machine complexity; and better scalability to very large sizes.
A lower center of gravity means improved stability afloat and lower gravitational fatigue loads.
Additionally, the drivetrain on a VAWT is at or near the surface, potentially making maintenance easier and less time-consuming. Fewer parts, lower fatigue loads and simpler maintenance all lead to reduced maintenance costs.
Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore(AP),India
Wind Energy Expert
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com

Note: The majority of comments posted are created by members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those Elsevier Ltd. We are not responsible for any content posted by members of the public or content of any third party sites that are accessible through this site. Any links to third party websites from this website do not amount to any endorsement of that site by the Elsevier Ltd and any use of that site by you is at your own risk. For further information, please refer to our Terms & Conditions.

Comment on this article

You must be registered and logged in to leave a comment about this article.