Related Links


IEA: Governments must accelerate clean energy deployment

Most clean energy technologies are not being deployed quickly enough despite technological progress, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), which is urging governments to accelerate the use of clean and renewable energy.

By Kari Williamson

The IEA statement comes in connection with an annual progress report presented to the Clean Energy Ministerial in London this week, which has gathered energy ministers from 23 leading economies representing 80% of global energy demand.

The report, Tracking Clean Energy Progress, highlights the rapid progress made in some renewable technologies, notably solar photovoltaics (PV) and onshore wind.

Onshore wind has seen 27% average annual growth over the past decade, and solar PV has grown at 42%, albeit from a small base. Even more impressive is the 75% reduction in system costs for solar PV in as little as three years in some countries.

This serves as evidence that rapid technology change is possible. Unfortunately, however, the report concludes that most clean energy technologies are not on track to make their required contribution to reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and thereby provide a more secure energy system.

“We have a responsibility and a golden opportunity to act,” says IEA Deputy Executive Director Ambassador Richard H Jones. “Energy-related CO2 emissions are at historic highs; under current policies, we estimate that energy use and CO2 emissions would increase by a third by 2020, and almost double by 2050. This would likely send global temperatures at least 6°C higher. Such an outcome would confront future generations with significant economic, environmental and energy security hardships – a legacy that I know none of us wishes to leave behind.”

The report urges aggressive policy action to take full advantage of the benefits offered by clean and renewable energy technologies.

“The ministers meeting this week in London have an incredible opportunity before them,” Jones adds. “It is my hope that they heed our warning of insufficient progress, and act to seize the security, economic and environmental benefits that a clean-energy transition can bring.”

Need to walk the walk

The report notes that many technologies with great potential for energy and emissions savings are making halting progress at best. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is not seeing the necessary rates of investment to develop full-scale demonstration projects, and nearly half of new coal-fired power plants are still being built with inefficient technology. Vehicle fuel-efficiency improvement is slow, and significant untapped energy-efficiency potential remains in the building and industry sectors.

In addition, while government targets for electric vehicles (20 million by 2020) are ambitious, as are continued nuclear expansion plans in many countries, translating plans into reality is easier said than done. Manufacturers’ production targets for electric vehicles after 2014 are highly uncertain; and increasing public opposition to nuclear power is proving challenging to address, the IEA points out.


The report offers three over-arching policy recommendations:

  1. Level the playing field for clean energy technologies. This means ensuring that energy prices reflect the true cost of energy – accounting for the positive and negative impacts of energy production and consumption;
  2. Unlock the potential of energy efficiency. Making sure that energy is not wasted and that it is used in the best possible way is the most cost-effective action and must be the first step of any policy aimed at building a sustainable energy mix; and
  3. Accelerate energy innovation and public support for research, development and demonstration. This will help lay the groundwork for private sector innovation, and speed technologies to market.

Share this article

More services


This article is featured in:
Policy, investment and markets




27 April 2012
In a world of declining and ever more expensive hydrocarbon sources of energy, confronted by a population explosion to 9 billion and atmospheric chemistry and environmental pollution in crisis, wouldn't it be prudent for Richard H Jones to steer the good ship 'IEA', with its vast cargo of influence, towards safer waters?

He really ought to read Dr James Mahaffey's 'Atomic Awakenings' - the 2020s will signal the start of global deployment of breeder reactors to supply base load electricity to the urban populations of the ever increasing number of industrialised nations.

Breeder reactors can supply all of the energy needs (including carbon-neutral liquid fuels and carbon neutral ammonia as feedstock for nitrate fertilisers, to maintain agricultura production), for every one of the 9 billion on the planet (at developed world standards) for all of time (at least for the 5 billion years the Sun has left), from inexhaustible uranium and thorium fuel supplies.

How can anyone, with a grain of common sense, seriously believe that windmills, plastic panels and 'contained' CO2 molecules can do that?

Note: The majority of comments posted are created by members of the public. The views expressed are theirs and unless specifically stated are not those Elsevier Ltd. We are not responsible for any content posted by members of the public or content of any third party sites that are accessible through this site. Any links to third party websites from this website do not amount to any endorsement of that site by the Elsevier Ltd and any use of that site by you is at your own risk. For further information, please refer to our Terms & Conditions.